What would you do if?
If somebody ( 2 Large Companies) accessed your Investment Account and
just took your names right out of your account.
Accused you of being a
Cyber Squatter, and through arbitration decisions, has placed defaming material
about you on the World Wide Web.
Would You Be Mad? Yes, Well so was I
Below it will show.
Notes : Letters in black show Elements of the
UDR,
Letters in Red,
White, Blue and Yellow are my arguments in response to these complaints.
I have more documents / material to back my case..
CERTIFICATION – Edward
Tapia is not a cyber squatter, and that his investments were not done with the intention of
bad faith and would like his good name returned by the removal of certain
arbitration decisions and the return of his Domain Names
Respondent certifies that the information contained in this
Response is to the best of Respondent’s
knowledge, it is complete and accurate, that this
Response is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as
to
harass, and that the assertions in this Response are warranted
under these Rules and under applicable
law, as it now exists or as it has been extended by a good-faith and reasonable argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS NEWS • Where the jobs will come from • Wall Street tumbles on price concerns
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Get Your Google Ads FREE Using This Secret
I have not filed my tax returns since 2002 - 2006, I always did my taxes on time prior to this. During this time I went through my second divorce, sold the house to settle with my wife, my half of the proceeds of the sale went to pay my first ex-wife back for child support I owed her. I started my construction business during this time but it wasn't what I was suppose to do, I went to school, ITT Tech for a while but it didn't work out for me it just got me more into debt (Student Loan I had to pay and I didn’t even get to finish, but I paid the loan). Since then I have been trying to get myself out of the hole I was in and paying off my debts. I didn't want to work at a normal 9-5 job because I thought it was more important to spend more time with my sons, at the time, one lived in Lancaster and the other lived in Thousand Oaks almost 2 hours apart, I was driving a lot, going to practices, games etc..so they would know who their father is. To me the time spent with them was more important then me going out and making money ( my taxes were also put on the back burner). I have been struggling to get through this difficult time in my life and at the same time trying start a home business on the internet, to pay my ex wives their child support, spend as much time with my boys as possible, help my parents now that they are almost 80 years old and succeeding with my goals, dreams and vision I had of building Churches. If you go to these websites you can see what I have been working on. I was just starting to see some light at the end of the tunnel then Tax and IRS letters starting coming in, if you like helping others you can help by taking a look at the article below involving Mr. Warren Buffet and signing up for the Aol.tv updates at the bottom of this response. It would be much appreciated..
www.ThePlacetobe.tv www.TapiaBros.com
INFOTAPIA.tv
Yes at the time of this vision I was a farmer (3rd Generation), deep down I still am.
Thank You and God Bless - "Si Dios Quiere”Quiere
(Complainant)
Domain Names In Dispute:
v.
Case Number: FA0409000328159
Edward Tapia – Infotapia – Aol.tv
(Respondent)
WIPO Arbitration and
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Microsoft Corporation v. Edward Tapia
Case No. DTV2005-0002
RESPONSE
[1.] A.)
B.) Microsoft - The Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on May 24, 2005
The Notifications stated that Complainants had submitted a Complaint for decision in accordance with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(ICANN) on August 26, 1999 and approved
by ICANN on October 24, 1999 (ICANN Policy), and the Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute
Resolution
Policy (ICANN Rules), adopted by ICANN on August 26, 1999 and
approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999, and the National
Arbitration Forum (NAF) Supplemental Rules (Supp.
Rules). ICANN Rule 4.
[2.] RESPONDENT INFORMATION
[a.] Name: Edward Tapia
[b.] Address:
[c.]
E-Mail: Aol.tv
[Provide the same information for Respondent’s authorized representative in the
administrative proceeding.] ICANN Rule
5(b)(ii).
The Respondent’s preferred method for communications directed to the Respondent
in the administrative proceeding: ICANN Rule 5(b)(iii).
Electronic-Only Material
[a.] Method: e-mail
[b.] Address: www.Ctyfrmr.tv
[c.] Contact: Aol.tv
The
Respondent chooses to have this dispute heard before a single member
administrative panel as stated in the
Complainant’s Complaint; ICANN Rule 5(b)(iv).
[3.]
RESPONSE TO FACTUAL AND LEGAL ALLEGATIONS MADE IN COMPLAINT
This
Response specifically responds to the statements and allegations contained in
the Complaint and includes any and all bases for the Respondent to retain
registration and use of the disputed domain name. ICANN Rule 5(b)(i). [The analysis in this section may require more
space than provided, but the entire Complaint shall not exceed ten (10)
pages. NAF Supp. Rule 5(a).]
[Elements of the UDRP are as follows:]
[a.]
[Specify in the space below the manner in which the domain name(s) is not/are
not identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
the Complainant has rights.] ICANN Rule 3(b)(ix)(1); ICANN Policy ¶ 4(a)(i).
Clearly not Identical
Aol.com
Aol.tv
[b] [Specify in the space below why the Respondent (domain-name holder) should be considered as having rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name(s) that is/are the subject of the complaint.] ICANN Rule 3(b)(ix)(2); ICANN Policy ¶ 4(a)(ii).
Respondent believes
1.) He registered domain name because it was available.
2.) He purchased domain name at 10 times the regular price of regular “ .tv” domains. Complainant says their host inadvertently sold domain name, was the price inadvertently raised also?
3.) He purchased domain as an investment for family’s future.
4.) Many Possibilities. Auctions On Live
a) Auctions
b) Adsense
c) Agriculture ......... etc.
[The Panel may consider any relevant aspects included in, but not limited to ICANN Policy ¶ 4(c):
(i.) Whether, before any notice to the Respondent of the dispute, Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name is in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or Notice the date May 01, 2004 was before Edward Tapia received notice of complaint on September 17, 2004.
-- Original Message ---
From:
Edward Tapia
To:
adsense-support@google.com
; info@google.com
; contactmanager ;
Ed Tapia
;
Sent:
Saturday,
May 01, 2004 7:17 AM
Subject:
Possibilities
This is one of my domains
Can you please show this to Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
I also like helping people.
100%
of Our First Live Auction Will Help 3 Charities
(ii.) Whether Respondent (as an individual, business, or other organization) has been commonly known by the domain name, even if Respondent has not acquired trademark or service mark rights; or
Get Your Google Ads FREE Using ThisSecret
(iii.) Whether Respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue.]
Respondent
believes in no possible way, can by him positioning his domain name to where it
is at right now would tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue
1 1.) Actually
Respondent believes the contrary, if anything greatly added value.
2 2.) Respondent
believes consumers will be able to distinguish the difference, and not be
confused.
3.) Respondent also believes by him
showing that his intentions were not done in bad faith that he has the right
to have his names back.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
[c.] [Specify in the space below why the domain name(s) should not be considered as having been registered and being used in bad faith.] ICANN Rule 3(b)(ix)(3); ICANN Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii).
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:11:26 -0700 (PDT) |
|
From: |
|
|
Subject: |
|
|
To: |
Edward Tapia wrote:
I have quite a few sites (domain names) I don't know how much to spend per
month and which ones I should use does your team help with this?
adwords-support@google.com wrote:
Hello Edward Tapia,
Thank you for giving us the information we needed to create your Google
AdWords account. Now we'll get to work on your
campaign. When
everything is ready, we'll notify you by email (typically within 2-5
business days).
If you have any questions, please reply to this email and
write 'Jumpstart' in the subject line. Or visit
https://adwords.google.com/support/?hl=en_US to find answers to
frequently asked questions and a 'contact us' link near the bottom of
the page. Having trouble opening this page? Copy and paste the URL in a
new browser window.
Sincerely,
The Google AdWords Jumpstart Team
"Where
Quality Counts"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
These are our domain names
Can you please show this to Larry Page and Sergey Brin. I also like helping people. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
[4.] OTHER LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
No other legal proceedings have been commenced or
terminated between the Registrant and Complainant in connection with or
relating to any of the domain name(s) that are the subject of the
complaint.
A.) Here is a Statement from AOL the complainant
We did previously prevail in a
UDRP (a previous arbitration) concerning
the domain name, Aol.tv However, the domain name was in
advertently released
by AOL’s Web hosting company.
[5.] RESPONSE
TRANSMISSION
1.) The Respondent
asserts that a copy of the Response, as
prescribed by NAF’s Supplemental Rules, has
been sent and
or
transmitted to the Complainant and the UDRP, in accordance with
ICANN Rule 5(b)(vii); NAF Supp.
Rule 5.
2.) The Respondent respectfully
requests, that the Administrative Panel denies the remedy requested to transfer
the Aol.tv and Moneycentral.tv domain names to the Complainants.
3.)
If appropriate and the allegations can be substantiated with evidence,
the rules provide that the Respondent may ask the Panel
to make a finding of reverse domain-name hijacking ICANN Rule 15(e).
4.) Respondent does not
understand, if complainant has been through this process before with
Respondent’s domain name, Aol.tv
and they say “ they previously prevailed” why not, at that
moment, was Aol.tv
unavailable to the consumer to purchase?
5.) Respondent
believes that AOL
underestimated the tremendous value
there really was in the .tv and either, inadvertently or
actually chose not to
register or purchase the domain name.
6.) Respondent
believes, America Online chose and figured since “They
previously prevailed, the Complainants
saw no reason to register or
purchase the
domain names that are the subject of these complaints.
7.) How many “.tv” domain name(s) has
How
many “.com”?
A
Here
is one.
AOL buys
Advertising.com for 435 million dollars
|
|
|
|
[6.] CLOSING STATEMENT
Closing
Statement: Respondent believes he was given a gift of vision
about the year 2000, had vision to build Church(s), never
knew how, when or where. “Si
Dios Quiere” in Spanish this means " If it's what
God wants"
CERTIFICATION
Respondent certifies that the information contained in this
Response is to the best of Respondent’s
knowledge, it is complete and accurate, that this Response is not
being presented for any improper purpose, such as
to
harass, and that the assertions in this Response are warranted
under these Rules and under applicable
law, as it now exists or as it has been extended by a good-faith and reasonable argument.
Respectfully
Submitted,
__Edward Tapia 10/27/04
[Signature] [Date]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|