Aol.tv - June 2009

I believe that this First Law represents an appropriate balance between the public and private effects of internet activity.

 

Submission to the Workshop on Internet Governance
26-27 February 2004

First Law of the Internet Author: Karl Auerbach,

former North American publicly elected Director, ICANN
I would like to suggest that in our inquiry into governance of the internet

that we ought to consider the adoption of certain guiding principles. Several

times over the last few years I have referred to a formulation that I call

The First Law of the Internet:
Every person shall be free to use the Internet in any way that is privately

beneficial without being publicly detrimental. The burden of demonstrating

public detriment shall be on those who wish to prevent the private use. Such a demonstration shall require clear and convincing evidence of public detriment.

The public detriment must be of such degree and extent as to

Justify the suppression of the private activity.

 

 

What would you do if?

If somebody ( 2 Large Companies) accessed your Investment Account (savings, checking, investments, domain names, etc)and just took your investments, that you paid for and a Company sold you right out of your account without your permission and accused you of being a Cyber Squatter, and through arbitration decisions, has placed defaming material about you on the World Wide Web. Would you be mad?

Yes, So was I

  I almost gave up, I was like how am I going to beat these guys. Then my boys saw how upset I was and asked what happened, I explained to them the situation and they could not understand how that could happen and then they got mad and told me Dad do not let these Big Companies do that to you. So here I am, I didn’t know how I was going to do it but now I have no doubt these names are ours and we want them back.

  So to everyone out there, Never Give Up On Your Dreams, no matter how crazy anyone thinks you are for dreaming, dreams do come true. Just keep believing and have faith.

CERTIFICATION – Mr. Tapia is not a cybersquatter, and that his investments were not done with the intention of bad faith.

  In December 2004 the name Aol.tv was transferred from Mr. Tapia’s account without his permission, and he lost all control of his name (Domain Name) and now he wants it returned.

 

  In July 2005 the name MoneyCentral.tv was transferred from Mr. Tapia’s account without his permission, and he lost all control of his name (Domain Name) and now he wants it returned.

 Anybody with a conscience will see both of these Companies are wrong about our investments being done in bad faith.

 

I am sure these companies are aware in the UDRP - all 4 accusations must be proven. The UDRP has been favoring the big corporations in the past. Well I now see the Pendulum about to change, at least for the righteous. By them taking our names out of my account, without my permission, they gave us the right to a Civil Case and when we succeed in in proving that the accusations of me being a "Cybersquatter" are totally false, and when we succeed with what is "Coming Soon" they will be left with two choices, honor Mr. Tapia's  conditions below:

Choice # 1

A) - Return of his good name, domain names returned and the removal of certain arbitration case decisions.

B) - To be financially compensated for his time, his effort, the financial and emotional distress it brought to not only him  and his health, but the effect these actions had on his entire Family, his Ex-wives and his Children (during this time frame he has had no health, vision, or dental insurance not even a doctor).

C) - The ability to continue building his Company without any disruptive legal or bully type actions which Microsoft, AOL and others are known for (even the  possibility of working together).

 

Mr. Tapia believes he is blessed with a special gift.

Some would call it vision, others will call it ridiculous, but close friends tell him whatever it is you hear or see just keep on doing what your doing, to believe, have faith, think, listen, to watch and learn. Then pray and ask for guidance, then take action.

       In the year of 2008 this was my vision, my thoughts!

       “This Will Be The Year, 2008 Is Going To Be Great”

Disruptive technology forced big changes in Hollywood this year: new contracts, new genres, new stars. As the behemoth industry steps into the digital era, entertainment execs will be paying even closer attention to the global Silicon Valley--especially the startups that are writing the rules and creating the tools for the digital entertainment age.

To help identify these startups, we'd like your help. We're looking for the top emerging private companies that are creating new business opportunities in digital entertainment. To qualify, companies must demonstrate significant market traction and be pursuing game-changing technology in one of the following sectors:

• Consumer Services
• Content Delivery Platforms
• Digital Content Publishers
• Enabling Tools, Applications and Services
• Mobile and Wireless
• Devices, Components and Infrastructure
• B2B Services

Check out the list of nominees : Look for  Aol.tv
http://www.onhollywood.goingon.com/permalink/post/24083

Choice # 2

Civil Action in US Court
In the United States, the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) 15 U.S.C. 15 U.S.C. § 1114(2)(D)(v) permits the domain name holder the exclusive remedy to bring a civil action when their domain has been suspended, disabled, or transferred as a result of an ICANN proceeding, in order to establish that their use of the domain is not unlawful. The court is authorized under the statute to grant injunctive relief to the registrant, including reactivation or transfer of the domain to the registrant. Id. At this time, a registrant will generally bring a declaratory judgment action, based on “reverse domain name hijacking” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(2)(D)(v) [ii] seeking injunctive relief.

The Consequences of being a "Reverse Domain Name High Jacker" - In a civil case, substantial monetary damages - even the of loss of their own domain name and more.

           

A Civil Lawsuit decision on court action.

I have a lot of support from family, long time friends, top internet lawyers, marketers and fellow entrepreneurs who are ready and willing to help go global. 

If Done, Microsoft and AOL Will Be Mine.

2009 Will Shine

 “Si Dios Quiere”

IBELIEVE.TV